…they just don’t often end up here. I always want to write comprehensively – but many of the things I think about are way too big to write comprehensively about in a blog format. So, in hopes of more of my thoughts making it here, even in incomplete form, some annotated links.
Things That I Have Been Thinking About
- Origami folding patterns
Painter Sarah Morris has been making paintings based on the crease diagrams developed by origami artists, who have sued her for copyright infringement. The news stories about this case focus on whether the paintings are transformative, whether they are fair use, and issues of credit and attribution. But the first question that comes to my mind is, how would origami crease patterns be copyrightable in the first place?
As far as I understand it, crease patterns are algorithmically-generated instructions – incomplete ones, at that – for how to produce an origami figure. Instructions, recipes, diagrams that represent pure facts: not copyrightable. Certainly there’s a lot of work involved in developing the crease patterns, but that’s not copyrightable either. Origami figures, once folded by an artist, may well be copyrightable in themselves – they’re certainly expressive and creative. Newly developed crease patterns may even be patentable! But I’m pretty sure Lang’s understanding of origami copyright is incorrect.
- Annoying permission requests
A student in a class _about copyright_ requested permission to quote from our Copyright Information site in a class presentation. Our Creative-Commons-licensed site. In a class presentation. Either that student is not going to pass that class, or that instructor is really incompetent.
Asking permission when fair use applies is a waste of your time and theirs, and shrinks fair use for all of us. Asking permission where Creative Commons licenses apply, or from someone who wants you to share their stuff is really quite disrespectful.
- National blanket licensing
Ariel Katz recently discussed the parallels between national blanket licensing and taxation without representation. Since there are frequently proposals to levy blanket fees on file storage media in the U.S., and blanket licenses are imposed on many venues here via extralegal (but close to unavoidable) means, I appreciated his insights on the fundamentally anti-democratic nature of the Canadian system. Choice quote:
“Canada has established a “dancing tax”, collected by, and for the
benefit of, private entities, because they asked, nobody could afford to
vigorously object, and the Board approved.”
[Edited July 9 to move music stuff to new post.]